Allegheny Valley approves 2 percent tax hike, no furloughs |
Valley News Dispatch

Allegheny Valley approves 2 percent tax hike, no furloughs

Emily Balser
Springdale Jr./Sr. High School

The Allegheny Valley School Board approved its 2018-19 budget with a 2 percent tax increase.

After public outcry over proposed staff cuts in the budget presented this month, officials decided to rework the numbers and add a tax increase instead.

The $23 million budget was approved in a 5-4 vote.

Voting for the budget were President Antonio Pollino, Vice President Glenna Renaldi, Elizabeth Moretti, Stephen Puskar and Shawn Whelan.

Directors voting against were Joelle McFarland, Larry Pollick, James Gaschler and Donald Rocco.

The tax millage increases from 20.3494 mills to 20.8377 mills, which will equal an increase of a little more than $40 for the average property owner in the district.

Officials also took $46,650 out of the capital reserve fund and a little more than $400,000 from the technology reserve fund to balance the budget.

There were no staff cuts.

One teacher, a high school social studies teacher, took advantage of an early retirement incentive offered by the district. Her position will not be filled with a new hire but, instead, will be filled by a current teacher, district spokeswoman Jan Zastawniak said.

The school board reversed its decision to furlough junior-senior high Assistant Principal Peter Simpson, technology teacher John McDermott and elementary teacher Kelly Slomka after residents ranging from current students to retirees turned out to support the trio at the school board’s June 12 meeting.

Officials have previously said the biggest expenses are salaries, pension costs, technology, special education and safety measures.

Emily Balser is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 724-226-4680, [email protected] or via Twitter @emilybalser.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.