Apollo to eliminate borough manager position, raise property taxes |
Valley News Dispatch

Apollo to eliminate borough manager position, raise property taxes

Mary Ann Thomas

Apollo Council has eliminated the borough manager’s position and expects to raise the property tax for next year.

A divided council voted 3-2 Monday at a special meeting to eliminate the manager’s position. Two councilmen were absent.

Councilwoman Ashley Stiffy said eliminating the position is part of borough council’s efforts to balance next year’s budget.

Council is seeking to raise taxes, Stiffy said, but has not decided by how much.

The board hasn’t acted yet on next year’s budget. Council plans to vote on a preliminary budget Dec. 6.

With Monday night’s vote, Cindee McDermott, the current borough manager, is set to lose her position on Dec. 26, said Tim Miller, the borough’s solicitor.

She has been manager for 6½ years.

“When I became the borough manager of Apollo, I never could have imagined how amazing and rewarding and challenging an experience it would be,” McDermott said Wednesday. “I will truly miss serving the residents of Apollo.”

Voting to cut the borough manager’s position were: Stiffy, John Steele and Nancy Walker.

“This is nothing personal against her,” Stiffy said, “but the position was costly.”

McDermott earned a $55,000 salary; with benefits and a pension, the cost of the position totaled $68,000, according to Stiffy.

“Our idea is to open a new, part-time position,” she added.

Voting against eliminating the position were: Council President John Kautz and Vice President Diane Bradshaw.

Kautz said the borough needs a professional with certain expertise.

Mayor Cindee Virostek said on her Facebook page that eliminating the borough manager’s position is not in the borough’s best interest.

Council members Dylan Foster and Dennis Gabrielli were not present at Monday’s meeting.

Mary Ann Thomas is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Mary Ann at 724-226-4691, [email protected] or via Twitter @MaThomas_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.