ShareThis Page
Diseased elms in Harrison cut down; officials defend enforcement as ‘necessary’ |
Valley News Dispatch

Diseased elms in Harrison cut down; officials defend enforcement as ‘necessary’

| Monday, March 26, 2018 10:48 p.m
Jack Fordyce | Tribune-Review
A view of the elm trees along the 1000 block of Carlisle Street in Harrison on Thursday, March 22, 2018.

Harrison is calling off enforcement action on a Carlisle Street property owner after two diseased elm trees were cut down.

The trees in the 1000 block of Carlisle were infected with the highly contagious Dutch elm disease, posing a threat to other elms in the area.

The property owner removed the trees Friday, said Lindsay Fraser, supervisor of the township’s zoning and ordinance department.

That happened after the township had set an April 15 deadline, after which it was going to have the trees removed and then assess the cost and penalties against the property owner.

Township officials did not identify the property owner or provide a specific address.

Dutch elm disease is a fungal disease of elm trees that is spread by elm bark beetles.

According to Fraser, the township was made aware of the infected trees in the fall.

She said the township first gave notice to the property owner in November to remove the trees.

Officials wanted the afflicted trees removed before they begin budding, when others would become more susceptible to infection.

In response to a resident who had criticized officials for threatening action against the property owner, Commissioner Charles Dizard defended the action as necessary.

He described Dutch elm disease as “like tree flu,” which could rapidly infect others on the street, which is known for its stately elms.

Property owners are responsible for taking care of such diseased trees, he said.

“It was a very necessary public safety action,” Dizard said.

Brian C. Rittmeyer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-226-4701, or via Twitter @BCRittmeyer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.