Former firefighter facing arson charges following Brackenridge blaze |
Valley News Dispatch

Former firefighter facing arson charges following Brackenridge blaze

Allegheny County Jail
Patrick Gillis

A firefighter accused of starting a May 21 fire which destroyed a Brackenridge home will face arson charges in court.

Patrick Gillis, 18, formerly a volunteer with the Pioneer Hose Fire Department in Brackenridge, is charged with felony counts of arson and intentionally destroying an unoccupied structure.

A third felony charge of causing a catastrophe was dropped Wednesday as Gillis waived his right to a preliminary hearing before District Judge Carolyn Bengel in Brackenridge.

The charges come after investigators say the fire that destroyed a duplex in the 800 block of Seventh Avenue was started by Gillis.

A witness told investigators that before the fire was discovered a man seen outside the house appeared to be “nervous and agitated, fidgeting, biting his nails and rolling his hands in his T-shirt,” according court documents.

The witness told investigators that the nervous man was later seen among the firefighters responding to the fire.

Another witness told investigators they saw Gillis at the house about 3:45 p.m., less than a half-hour before the blaze was reported.

When police questioned Gillis at the scene, he initially told them he had moved out of the Seventh Avenue home but was supposed to meet a friend at the duplex that afternoon. He told police he waited for his friend for five minutes and turned to leave when he received a page telling him to respond to the fire.

Officers indicate in court documents they didn’t buy Gillis’ story and so informed him of his Miranda rights and placed him in custody.

After Gillis was taken into custody, police said he confessed he started the fire by lighting paper and placing it in the microwave oven, according to court documents. Investigators with the Alle­gheny County Fire Marshal’s Office confirmed the fire began in the microwave.

Gillis allegedly told police he set the fire because he wanted to respond to a fire call.

While in court Wednesday, Gillis’ attorney, Rodney Blaine Jones, requested that his client’s bond, set at $25,000, be significantly reduced so Gillis could finish the school year during summer classes. Gillis is a senior at Highlands High School.

However, Assistant District Attorney Chris Marsili told the judge that his office was not inclined to consider such a reduction considering the nature of the charges. Further, after Jones asserted his client claimed he had a no prior criminal history, Bengel responded that Gillis had previously been charged with a misdemeanor crime.

Bengel denied Jones’ request and kept the bond set at $25,000.

Gillis was taken to the Alle­gheny County Jail ahead of an as-yet unscheduled formal arraignment in Pittsburgh.

Matthew Medsger is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-226-4675, [email protected] or via Twitter @matthew_medsger.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.