Greensburg woman with learner’s permit charged with DUI |
Valley News Dispatch

Greensburg woman with learner’s permit charged with DUI

Renatta Signorini

A Greensburg woman who was learning how to drive was arrested last week after, police say, she drove into oncoming traffic in Washington Township while a state trooper was nearby.

Stephannallye Mata, 27, had a learners permit when she was driving on Route 66 near Route 366 at 2 p.m. on Nov. 29, according to a news release issued Thursday. A trooper patrolling the area saw her driving erratically and pulled the vehicle over.

Troopers said Mata appeared to be under the influence of alcohol and told police she had taken a prescription medication used to treat panic disorders and seizures. She was charged with attempted escape, driving under the influence, disorderly conduct and other offenses.

Her passenger, a 50-year-old Greensburg man, was also intoxicated, police said. He was a licensed driver. Police plan to arrest him, but no charges had been filed Thursday morning.

Mata is free on $15,000 bond. A Dec. 17 preliminary hearing is set. She did not have an attorney listed in online court records.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Renatta at 724-837-5374, [email protected] or via Twitter @byrenatta.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.