Harmar looks for a new secretary who could become the township’s manager |
Valley News Dispatch

Harmar looks for a new secretary who could become the township’s manager

Emily Balser
The Harmar Township municipal building.

Harmar officials are looking for a new township secretary following the resignation of secretary Donna Piper last week.

Supervisors said Piper’s resignation was effective Wednesday. She had been with the township for about four years and served as the secretary and treasurer. She was employed on a year-to-year basis.

Supervisor Bob Exler said Piper was leaving for another job.

“We wish her well,” Exler said.

In the meantime, office assistant Laura Conte will serve as assistant secretary, and bookkeeper Tracey Crump will serve as assistant treasurer for an extra $200 per month each.

Officials said they will begin advertising for a new secretary-treasurer but hope to transition the position into a township manager eventually.

“We think it makes more sense in this day and age,” Supervisor Bob Seibert said.

Piper’s salary was around $65,000 per year, but officials said they want to make the position more competitive and will be flexible on the salary to reflect the candidate’s education and experience. They couldn’t provide an exact amount of how much they are willing to pay.

Harmar joins Harrison and Kiski townships as communities moving to hire a manager in the coming year.

Attempts to reach Piper for comment were unsuccessful.

Emily Balser is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Emily at 724-226-4680, [email protected] or via Twitter @emilybalser.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.