Archive

Leechburg reacts to arrest of Police Chief Mike Diebold on child predator charges | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Leechburg reacts to arrest of Police Chief Mike Diebold on child predator charges

VNDDiebold2010618
Louis B. Ruediger | Tribune-Review
Leechburg Police Chief Mike Diebold (center) is escorted to a police car from the Lower Burrell police station after his arrest on Friday, Jan. 5, 2018.
VNDDiebold1010618
Louis B. Ruediger | Tribune-Review
Leechburg police Chief Mike Diebold (second from right) is escorted to a police car from the Lower Burrell police station.
VNDDiebold3010618
Louis B. Ruediger | Tribune-Review
Leechburg Police Chief Michael Diebold sits in the back seat of a police car at the Lower Burrell police station after his arrest.on Friday, Jan. 5, 2018.
Vnddieboldroom03070617
Andrew Russell | Tribune-Review
Leechburg Police Chief Mike Diebold in his hospital bed in July, just days after his accident.

For those closest to Leechburg police Chief Mike Diebold, it’s difficult to understand the child predator allegations that came out against him Friday after an investigation by the state Attorney General’s Office.

Diebold, 40, of Forks Church Road in Gilpin was arrested Friday after attempting to rendezvous with a 14-year-old girl who was actually an undercover agent, according to the attorney general.

The news came as a shock to friends and family who have stood by Diebold during the turbulent six months since he was injured in a fireworks accident and lost part of one arm.

It seemed there was a light at the end of the tunnel after Diebold reached an agreement at the end of December with borough officials on what steps he needed to take to possibly return to work as chief.

Diebold’s mother comments

Diebold’s mom, Karen Diebold, was obviously shaken during a phone interview on Saturday.

“I just want to say that people have to not blame family members like me and Danielle (Diebold’s wife),” she said. “It’s hard enough as it is to go through this.”

Karen Diebold said the community has been great in rallying around the family since the accident, but she said blaming them related to the allegations against Diebold isn’t fair.

“It’s really awful,” she said.

Karen seemed to be somewhat in disbelief of the allegations against her son, saying residents should wait for all of the facts of the case to come out.

“If Mike did it, then he’s going to have to pay the price, but what if he didn’t?” she said, fighting back tears.

Attempts to contact Danielle Diebold by phone and Facebook on Saturday were unsuccessful.

Leechburg had rallied around him

Not only is Diebold’s family left reeling, but so is the Leechburg community that rallied around him over the past six months as he recovered from his severe injuries.

Nearly $17,000 was raised for Diebold and his family through a GoFundMe account since the accident.

The online GoFundMe account said Saturday that “the campaign is completed and no longer active.” It’s unclear when it became inactive, and “completed” was not defined.

The person who started the fund could not be reached for clarification Saturday.

Hundreds of people turned out to other fundraisers to support him.

One was the sale of T-shirts that offered encouragement and support: “We Stand By Ours. #teamdiebold15656.”

Most recently, dozens of residents turned out during Leechburg Council meetings to back him while borough officials discussed an agreement regarding the terms to reinstate Diebold as chief. He had previously expressed hopes to return to work shortly after the first of the year.

Community reacts

Shawn Lerch, former Leechburg mayor and longtime Diebold supporter, was at a loss for words Saturday.

“I’m devastated and shocked,” he said. “I feel for the family.”

Lerch, who worked alongside Diebold when he was mayor and then supported him throughout his recovery, said he had no idea what Diebold allegedly had been doing.

“At this point in time, he’s the least of my concerns,” Lerch said. “I’m worried about the family — the fallout.”

Leechburg resident John Fiorina, who helped save Diebold’s life when he applied a tourniquet to his arm after the fireworks accident, said he is heartbroken for Diebold’s family.

“I feel betrayed, manipulated and mostly more upset that his family has to endure it,” Fiorina said.

Fiorina said this is one more negative thing to put Leechburg in the spotlight.

“I think it’s appalling what he allegedly attempted to do,” he said.

Leechburg resident A.J. Stewart said he feels for Diebold’s family as well as the people who donated money to his recovery.

“I feel absolutely terrible for his wife and children — they should not have to endure the effects of his terrible decision,” Stewart said. “I feel terrible for the folks who supported him and donated their hard-earned money and personal time to his cause of his amputation.”

Still on paid leave

Mayor Wayne Dobos said Saturday that Diebold remains on paid leave until officials can meet with lawyers to determine the next step regarding his employment following his arrest.

Dobos said he didn’t know if Diebold’s paid leave could retroactively be stopped once they consult with lawyers.

“I informed the lawyer (Friday), and I figure he’ll get back to us on Monday,” he said.

As mayor, Dobos is in charge of the police department. He said the remaining officers will perform extra duties while the role of chief is sorted out.

The mayor and council had moved cautiously as Diebold went through the process of returning to work from his serious injury.

Dobos said Friday the AG’s investigation wasn’t anything that Leechburg officials were privy to. As a result, it didn’t have a hand in the delay in Diebold’s reinstatement as police chief.

The investigation

According to his arrest papers, the investigation started Sept. 15 when Diebold placed an online advertisement that made it clear he was a police officer looking for a sexual relationship with a female partner of “any age, race or status.” He allegedly went by the user name “kutecop4you.”

Undercover agents with the state Attorney General’s Office responded, saying “on multiple occasions” that they were a 14-year-old girl in the eighth grade.

Authorities say Diebold responded anyway, with sexually explicit encouragement and a request to meet the girl.

He was arrested Friday in Lower Burrell when he thought that meeting was taking place.

Police said Diebold’s cellphone when arrested included a message thread with the girl.

According to the investigator, Diebold admitted that he “knew that sexual contact with a 14-year(-old) child was wrong and illegal and that his life was totally over.”

Authorities say Diebold “stated that he has been utilizing the internet to post ads in the personal sections for the last several years.”

Diebold remains in Westmoreland County Prison in lieu of $500,000 straight bond, meaning that he would have to come up with the entire amount in order to be released while awaiting trial. His preliminary hearing is scheduled for Jan. 16 in front of District Judge Cheryl Peck Yakopec in Allegheny Township.

No lawyer was listed for Diebold in online court documents Saturday.

Staff writers Chuck Beidka and Madasyn Czebiniak and contributing writer Joyce Hanz contributed to this report. Emily Balser is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 724-226-4680 or [email protected] or via Twitter @emilybalser.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.