New Kensington taking down more blighted buildings |
Valley News Dispatch

New Kensington taking down more blighted buildings

Madasyn Czebiniak
Jack Fordyce | Tribune-Review
An abandoned duplex at 1261-1263 Kenneth Ave. in New Kensington is overgrown with weeds in this file photo from Thursday, May 10, 2018.

New Kensington is using federal grant money to tear down five more blighted buildings owned by the city and improve city streets.

The city plans to demolish 513 Linden Ave., 1223 Victoria Ave., 1123 Woodmont Ave., 1261-1263 Kenneth Ave. and 359 Main St.

All five were declared public nuisances in May, giving the city the ability to seek contract bids to bring them down.

Jadell Minniefield Construction Services Inc. is doing the demolitions, which began in late October and are expected to be done within the next couple of weeks. The redevelopment authority approved a $65,000 contract for the work in July.

The street improvements began in late October and should be done within the next week.

A. Folino Construction, Inc. is paving and installing curb cuts along Fourth Street from Freeport Street to Fifth Avenue, and along Freeport Street from Fourth Street to Stevenson Boulevard. The authority approved a $115,000 contract for the work in October.

Federal Community Development Block Grant money is being used to pay for the work. Money from the federal CDBG program helps pay for blight removal and projects that target low- to moderate-income areas. The redevelopment authority manages the city’s CDBG money, which also was used to raze four fire-damaged commercial properties along 10th Street earlier this year .

Snider hopes to be able to raze eight to 10 more properties with CDBG money next year.

“It will depend obviously on how bids come back,” said Sarah Snider, the redevelopment authority’s executive director.

Madasyn Czebiniak is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Madasyn at 724-226-4702, [email protected], or via Twitter @maddyczebstrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.