No tax increase proposed in West Deer |
Valley News Dispatch

No tax increase proposed in West Deer

Emily Balser
West Deer Township municipal offices.

West Deer’s $6.4 million preliminary budget for next year includes no increase in property taxes, despite proposed spending increases to cover pay raises and finish a park project on a former Nike missile site.

Township supervisors are expected to vote to pass the budget on Dec. 19.

The tax rate will remain 2.99 mills.

At that rate, the tax bill for a house assessed at $114,000 would be about $340.

Township Manager Daniel Mator said proposed spending for 2019 is about the same as this year aside from annual contract increases and money needed to put toward a $300,000 match to secure a state Department of Conservation Natural Resources grant.

The grant will be used to finish improvements at a former Nike missile site off Route 910, including completing a small parking lot, a playground, a pavilion and a walking trail.

The township’s preliminary budget includes $1 million for road improvements and $250,000 for stormwater system improvements.

“(We’ve) been doing that for the last couple of years,” Mator said.

The township is also budgeting money to purchase two new public works vehicles and a new police cruiser.

The preliminary budget is available for review on the township website at and at the municipal building, 109 East Union Road.

Emily Balser is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Emily at 724-226-4680, [email protected] or via Twitter @emilybalser.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.