ShareThis Page
Pittsburgh Mills mall buyer expects new leases soon |
Valley News Dispatch

Pittsburgh Mills mall buyer expects new leases soon

| Wednesday, May 2, 2018 6:24 p.m
Eric Felack | Tribune-Review
The Pittsburgh Mills mall sold for $100 at auction.
Louis B. Ruediger | Tribune-Review
A small group of shoppers and Frazer Township officials gathered on Wednesday to witness the foreclosure auction of the Pittsburgh Mills mall. In what was simply a legal move, a Morgan Stanley trust, in effect bought the shopping mall from itself for $100.
The interior of Pittsburgh Mills mall is seen in this screenshot from the video 'Dead Mall Series: The $100 Malll: The Disaster of Pittsburgh Mills' on This is Dan Bell YouTube channel.
The interior of Pittsburgh Mills mall is seen in this screenshot from the video 'Dead Mall Series: The $100 Malll: The Disaster of Pittsburgh Mills' on This is Dan Bell YouTube channel.

After a tumultuous few years for the Pittsburgh Mills mall in Frazer, including a foreclosure, the property has been purchased by Long-Island based Mason Asset Management.

Elliot Nassim, president of the company, confirmed Wednesday the company finalized the sale of the property on Tuesday.

He didn’t have an exact amount of the sale and property records weren’t yet available through Allegheny County, but he believed it to be around $12 million.

The purchase includes the Galleria at Pittsburgh Mills, which is the enclosed mall building and related parking lots. The Village at Pittsburgh Mills, which is the outlying businesses and restaurants, was not part of deal.

“A lot of money was spent building it and putting the infrastructure in place, and we feel there’s opportunity to bring value through some re-leasing and redevelopment,” he said.

Nassim wouldn’t elaborate on the company’s plan for the mall, but said he hopes to announce new leases “very, very shortly.”

“We look forward to working with the township to come up with the best uses for the property, and we will do our best to implement the right strategy,” Nassim said.

He said the mall will remain open for business throughout the transition. The mall’s vacancy rate has varied, analysts have said, over the past several years. Once almost 90 percent full, the vacancy rate has topped 30 percent more recently.

The mall “sold” for $100 at a foreclosure auction in January 2017. In reality, mortgage holder Morgan Stanley Capital took possession of the property.

Mason Asset Management owns about 130 properties, including 40 other malls across the country.

Frazer Supervisor Lori Ziencik said she’s not familiar with the company and the supervisors haven’t met them, but she’s eager to do so.

She said she noticed in their portfolio they had worked with Rural King stores.

“We do believe that that would be successful here,” she said.

The mall’s assessed value has plummeted over the years from $190 million in 2006 down to $6.5 million in February, said Manus Clancy, senior managing director at New York City-based Trepp LLC, which provides market research for the real estate and banking industries.

Clancy wasn’t familiar with Mason Asset Management, but he said its purchase of the mall could be what is needed to fill empty storefronts and stay viable.

“We’ve seen guys come in and turn malls in to community colleges, call centers, office space,” he said.

Clancy said what’s happened to the Mills is somewhat unique because it’s a fairly young mall, built in 2005.

However, he said malls across the country are facing similar issues after retailers have filed for bankruptcy and closed stores.

“It tends to snowball,” Clancy said. “You lose one big anchor (store), a mall can usually muddle through. You lose two and nobody’s going to the mall anymore.”

Calls made to a representative of Jones Lang LaSalle, which manages operations at the mall, were not immediately returned.

Emily Balser is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 724-226-4680, or on Twitter @emilybalser.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.