Police: Tarentum sports car driver could have killed 2 officers directing traffic |
Valley News Dispatch

Police: Tarentum sports car driver could have killed 2 officers directing traffic


Police say a Tarentum man could have killed two police officers directing traffic around a house fire June 14 with his reckless driving.

William Lewis, 32, of 10th Avenue is charged with two felony counts of aggravated assault and related charges as a result.

Police say Tarentum officers were directing traffic around a house fire on Butler Street.

Officers say while they were working to keep traffic moving, they heard tires squealing and saw smoke coming from beneath a yellow Chevrolet Corvette. Several motorists, according to court documents, were trying to turn the officers’ attention to that Corvette.

Lewis was behind the wheel, according to police, who say they saw his car shifting left and right in its lane while Lewis revved the engine, spinning his tires.

Police told the Lewis to pull over, according to court documents, and he responded by again revving the engine and pulling away. According to court documents, Lewis stopped his car behind a Tarentum police car, but not until after nearly hitting two officers.

“Due to its speed, I am confident that had this vehicle hit me or Officer (Kurt Jendrejewski), we would have suffered serious bodily injury or death,” Detective Sgt. Mark Glogow­ski wrote in court documents.

Lewis apparently told officers he could not be arrested, only charged with reckless driving. Officers disagreed and placed him in custody.

Lewis also is charged with two misdemeanor counts of endangering another person and related charges.

He waived his right to a preliminary hearing on Wednesday before District Judge Carolyn Bengel in Brackenridge.

Lewis is free on bond while awaiting an as-yet-unscheduled formal arraignment in Pittsburgh.

Matthew Medsger is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-226-4675, [email protected] or via Twitter @matthew_medsger.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.