ShareThis Page
Riverview teachers, school board to talk Monday, first meeting since strike authorization vote |
Valley News Dispatch

Riverview teachers, school board to talk Monday, first meeting since strike authorization vote

Riverview School District administration office

Negotiators for the Riverview School District and its teachers union are set to meet Monday, days after union members authorized a strike.

The teachers, members of the Riverview Education Association, voted “overwhelmingly” on Oct. 10 to authorize their negotiating team to call a strike, the union announced Friday.

It doesn’t necessarily mean there will be a strike; it gives the union’s bargaining team the ability to call one.

The union has 90 members and there are 995 students in the district from Oakmont and Verona.

The last contract between the district and the union expired at the end of June.

“We have been negotiating since January and we have been without a contract for more than 100 days, but the district seems uncommitted to the process,” association President Mark Capsambelis said in the statement.

The union said its negotiating team and the district have met 16 times since January. But it claimed the district has been late for nine of those meetings and said progress has been slow.

“It’s hard to believe the board is taking this seriously when only one of the (school board) members shows up and they leave the negotiations to the superintendent, solicitor, and business manager,” Capsambelis said.

The district and union are scheduled to meet for talks Monday afternoon, school board President Maureen McClure said. The school board has a public meeting Monday night.

On the union’s claim that the district is “uncommitted to the process,” McClure said, “We’ll just have to agree not to agree on that.”

“We have been very committed to the process. There was a lot of work to be done,” she said. “We need to be fair to everyone, not only to the teachers — which we want to be paid fairly — we want the taxpayers who we have to take money away from to be treated fairly.”

An issue in the talks has been updating the contract to reflect current state school codes, which McClure said had not been done in a long time.

McClure said she believed talks were going well, and that “quite a bit” has been accomplished. She said the district would have wanted to meet for talks more than the sides have to date.

“Schedules with the people involved have been complicated,” she said. “We can’t take full responsibility for that.”

McClure said it’s difficult to tell what impact the strike authorization vote may have on negotiations.

“We’re committed,” she said. “We want very much to get things not only settled but be sure the teachers, the parents, the students and the taxpayers all have a fair deal.”

Brian Rittmeyer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Brian at 724-226-4701, or via Twitter @BCRittmeyer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.