Archive

ShareThis Page
Springdale updates its borough codes to eliminate archaic laws, some dating back to 1904 | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Springdale updates its borough codes to eliminate archaic laws, some dating back to 1904

466394webspringdalesign

One no longer has to worry about fastening an animal, such as a horse, to a tree and blocking a public thoroughfare in Springdale.

That’s one of 30 outdated or obsolete ordinances that council has repealedin an effort to clean up and modernize the borough’s code book.

While discharging firearms in the borough remains illegal, “exploding torpedoes” are no longer addressed.

Some of the jettisoned ordinances date to the borough’s first year of operation in 1904.

Loitering, however, is still against the law and has been since 1912.

Only now, the fines and penalties have increased.

Penalties for those letting their grass and hedges grow to excess will also face larger fines, and bonding for public officials has been updated for the first time since 1944.

Affixed house numbers now need to be four inches high instead of three. That’s one of 14 ordinances that have been updated .

Those “peddling” lotteries and games of chance are now governed by the state’s Small Games of Chance law. The fines for soliciting without permission are also increased.

But you no longer need an OK from the burgess (mayor) to pile construction materials in front of your house.

George Guido is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.