State says Springdale Township is violating water regulations, failed to test for copper and lead |
Valley News Dispatch

State says Springdale Township is violating water regulations, failed to test for copper and lead

Springdale Township is appealing an order from the state Department of Environmental Protection that claims officials have violated multiple safe drinking water laws by failing to, among other things, properly test the water for contaminants such as copper and lead.

The order, sent to township officials Oct. 16, outlines multiple violations and said the township faces a penalty of up to $5,000 per day for each violation. The DEP has set specific time frames for the township to remedy the violations, ranging from 10 days to three months.

The administrative order was issued after the township failed to respond to a request for corrective action following a March 29 inspection of the system.

The township appealed the order Nov. 16, but no changes have been made as of Nov. 30, according got the DEP. DEP officials have yet to meet with anyone from the township.

Messages left for Craig Alexander, the lawyer representing the township, were not immediately returned Friday.

“To date, no meeting has been scheduled,” said Lauren Fraley, DEP spokeswoman. “Springdale (Township) is still responsible for compliance with the order.”

The order alleges that the township:

  • failed to monitor the for disinfection byproducts known as TTHMs and HAA5s in 2016;
  • failed to monitor the for lead and copper in 2016;
  • failed to issue a required public notification for failing to monitor the above contaminates;
  • failed to submit required registration, reporting, record-keeping and monitoring of the water system to the DEP since 2012;
  • failed to obtain water allocation permits to purchase water from Harmar Municipal Authority and Springdale and Cheswick boroughs as required by law.

In addition, standing water was found in several areas of the water system during the March 29 inspection.

Fraley said Harmar, Springdale Borough and Cheswick are all in compliance with their testing and reporting.

Springdale Township Commissioner Tim Sweet, who is in charge of the water system, said he didn’t realize the township wasn’t in compliance. This is his first year as a commissioner.

“I didn’t know we had to send a report in,” he said. “I’m learning.”

Sweet acknowledged the previous officials hadn’t kept up with the testing and reporting. He said he is trying to fix the issues and be in compliance going forward.

“It should have been done in a timely manner,” he said. “We’ve just got to follow our plan — we are doing that as we speak.”

The township did issue the required notice to residents this month letting them know the water hasn’t been properly tested and reported to DEP.

Sweet said the water is still safe for residents to drink and any costs associated with fixing the issues outlined by DEP won’t cost the residents anything.

Residents with questions are asked to call the township office at 724-274-4034.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.