Vandergrift man accused of threatening woman with a gun |
Valley News Dispatch

Vandergrift man accused of threatening woman with a gun


A Vandergrift man is accused of brandishing a handgun during an argument late Sunday and threatening to shoot a woman.

Kevin L. Beecher, 40, was arraigned Monday on charges of aggravated assault, making terroristic threats, simple assault and harassment before Washington Township District Judge Jason Buczak and ordered held in the Westmoreland County Prison after failing to post a $100,000 bail.

State police Trooper Luke Hanko said in court papers that, according to the victim, Beecher pulled out a handgun, “cocked the slide” and threatened to shoot her during an argument at a Millstone Road residence in Bell Township shortly after 11 p.m. Sunday.

When Beecher was questioned later, he denied threatening the woman with a handgun during the argument, Hanko said in court documents. Hanko reported police discovered a handgun with “a loaded magazine and a round in the chamber” similar to one described by the victim at Beecher’s residence when he was questioned.

The handgun was confiscated as evidence, according to police.

Beecher’s preliminary hearing is scheduled for Oct. 1 before Buczak.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter @ppeirce_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.