ShareThis Page
Work to replace 2nd East Deer bridge delayed |
Valley News Dispatch

Work to replace 2nd East Deer bridge delayed

| Friday, July 20, 2018 4:33 a.m.
Louis B. Ruediger | Tribune-Review
A small bridge along Freeport Road in East Deer near the Pittsburgh Glass Works plant is one of two slated for repairs, which are now set to occur in a few weeks. File photo from 2016.

While work to replace one bridge on Freeport Road in East Deer is underway, the start of work on another nearby has again been delayed.

Construction to replace the bridge over Baileys Run, in front of the Creighton post office, is now scheduled to start the week of Aug. 13, according to Plenary Walsh Keystone Partners. It was previously scheduled to have started this week.

A reason for the delay was not given.

It’s expected to take until the end of the year to finish. During construction, traffic will be restricted to a single, alternating lane controlled by temporary traffic signals.

Work is already underway on the bridge over nearby Crawford Run, near Sheetz. Traffic there is also limited to a single, alternating lane with temporary traffic signals.

The bridges are among 558 structurally deficient spans being replaced under the state’s Rapid Bridge Replacement Project, a private-public partnership between PennDOT and Plenary Walsh Keystone Partners.

Brian Rittmeyer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Brian at 724-226-4701, or via Twitter @BCRittmeyer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.