Marcellus shale drilling company pitches fracking to A-K Valley business leaders |
Valley News Dispatch

Marcellus shale drilling company pitches fracking to A-K Valley business leaders

Mary Ann Thomas

A Monroeville-based Marcellus shale well developer has plans to drill more natural gas wells in the Alle-Kiski Valley next year.

Huntley & Huntley Energy Explorations of Monroeville will announce the new wells when approvals are finalized sometime next year, according to Paul Burke, vice president and general counsel for Huntley & Huntley.

The company is best known for fracking for natural gas beneath Deer Lakes Park in West Deer and Frazer. Environmentalists and some park supporters opposed it.

In the Valley, the company has permits for well pads in Allegheny Township, Upper Burrell and Plum.

Elsewhere, it has a well pad under construction in Penn Township, Westmoreland County, and two more in the permitting process. It’s also seeking approvals in Elizabeth Township, Allegheny County.

Construction is planned at the other locations in the next several months, according to Burke. He declined to disclose them.

Huntley & Huntley will hold public meetings with landowners near those sites to provide details on the project and its timeline.

Selling fracking to the public

Huntley & Huntley representatives have been visiting local chambers of commerce, such as their visit to the Alle Kiski Strong Chamber on Wednesday morning at the Pittsburgh Mills mall in Frazer, to tout the benefits of continued natural gas exploration and drilling in the region.

“This is the steel industry on steroids,” exclaimed Ed Valentas, director of landowner and community relations for Huntley & Huntley, who spoke to the chamber Wednesday.

Increased Marcellus shale well development and more pipelines exporting the natural gas from the region offer prosperity for landowners and businesses, he said, and create more local jobs.

Valentas said Marcellus shale wells provide income from leases with landowners and are “the savior of the family farm.”

Effects worry opponents

However, the promise and the impact or perceived impact of drilling on the land and water supplies continue to be contentious.

For example, a recently proposed update to Plum’s zoning ordinance seeks to limit Marcellus shale drilling in the borough.

Some residents are concerned about potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing to reach the natural gas. The process injects a mix of high-pressure water, sand and chemicals underground to crack the shale, which releases the natural gas.

One of the most challenging issues faced by the gas industry is the “misinformation” from some environmentalists, especially the “zero fossil fuel fanatics,” Valentas said.

As an example, he cited the Marcellus shale wells around Beaver Run Reservoir in Washington Township and the environmental concerns during the approval and development of the wells by CNX Gas.

The reservoir provides water to more than 120,000 homes and businesses in five counties.

“Water samples were tested and after five years, there was no change in the water quality,” he said.

Testing of samples since 2011 by Indiana University of Pennsylvania students and faculty have not detected a threat related to the wells to reservoir water, although they observed silt from construction activities, according to a June 2016 IUP report.

Mary Ann Thomas is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 724-226-4691, [email protected] or via Twitter @MaThomas_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.