ShareThis Page
Logans Ferry Road reopening this week questionable |
Valley News Dispatch

Logans Ferry Road reopening this week questionable

Brian C. Rittmeyer | Tribune-Review
Plum officials plan to resurface more than 30 streets this year through a paving contract with Plum-based A. Liberoni Inc.

Logans Ferry drivers may have to deal with detours for a little bit longer.

The road, closed near Entrance Drive in Plum since Oct. 2, may not reopen this week as previously expected.

There was hope it could reopen before Thanksgiving, but the contractor working on a bridge project there has been delayed and can’t confirm that the road will reopen by Wednesday, said Jeff Rossi, a spokesman for the state’s Rapid Bridge Replacement Project.

A small bridge spanning a defunct railroad span was structurally deficient. Instead of a bridge replacement, the gap is being filled in and drainage improvements are being made in the area.

Rossi said the contractor was not confirming it would have the road ready for paving this week. If the work is not done by Wednesday, the holiday and weather could push the paving back a few more days, Rossi said.

“Contractually, they have until Dec. 15 to complete the job, so at this point they are still way ahead of schedule if the opening slips a few more days,” he said.

About 12,000 cars travel that part of Logans Ferry daily near border of Allegheny and Westmoreland counties. The official detour route for cars is about eight miles long, while a separate detour for trucks is about 14 miles long.

Brian C. Rittmeyer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-226-4701, or via Twitter @BCRittmeyer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.