Nulph, Dermody unopposed for 33rd state rep. nominations |
Valley News Dispatch

Nulph, Dermody unopposed for 33rd state rep. nominations

Madasyn Czebiniak
Joshua Nulph

A retirement consultant who also serves as chairman of the Harrison Township Recreation Board is now the presumptive Republican nominee for Pennsylvania’s 33rd District.

Joshua Nulph, 20, of Harrison, is the only Republican appearing on the ballot for the State House in the May 15 primary.

He is running against Democrat Frank Dermody, who has held the seat since 1991. Dermody is unopposed for his party’s nomination in the primary as well.

Nulph works for his family’s company, Safety First Retirement, and is a Highlands School District graduate.

His agenda includes job growth, property tax elimination, fighting the opioid epidemic, limiting wasteful spending, and promoting family and community values.

He also supports term limits and has pledged to serve no more than five terms in the House.

“The dysfunction in Harrisburg is an insult to the hard-working families in the 33rd District and in Western Pennsylvania,” he said in prepared remarks. “I am running to change the culture in Harrisburg and to put the voters before the special interests.”

“For far too the long the interests of the hard-working families in this district and region have been ignored. Voters deserve someone who is going to go to Harrisburg and fight for them.”

The 33rd District includes parts of Allegheny and Westmoreland counties. In the Valley, it includes: Arnold, Brackenridge, Cheswick, East Deer, Frazer, Harmar, part of Harrison, Indiana Township, New Kensington, Oakmont, Springdale, Springdale Township, and Tarentum.

Madasyn Czebiniak is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 724-226-4702, [email protected], or on Twitter @maddyczebstrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.