Missing Vandergrift girl, 16, found safe by FBI |
Valley News Dispatch

Missing Vandergrift girl, 16, found safe by FBI

Chuck Biedka
Lena Dixon, 16, with her mother, Stefanie Grantham, prior to her disappearance.

A missing Vandergrift girl’s mother started driving Friday night to an undisclosed location to reunite with the 16-year-old found by the FBI.

Lena Dixon, the girl who has been missing for weeks, has been found safe, the FBI tweeted after 9 p.m. Friday.

Dixon’s mother, Stefanie Grantham, said she was driving to reunite with her daughter.

“I’m happy and relieved,” she said.

“We were asked to not say where she is until I can get to my daughter,” Grantham told the Tribune-Review from her cell phone in her car.

She said a relative is babysitting her two younger children.

“This is what I have been praying for,” Grantham said.

FBI Pittsburgh spokeswoman Catherine Policicchio said no other details were available Friday night.

Vandergrift police Sgt. Anthony DePanicis said his department and the FBI worked countless hours on the case.

Dixon was last seen about 4 p.m. June 26 when she left her job at McDonald’s restaurant on Hyde Park Road in Allegheny Township. She was at work about 20 minutes but left.

Dixon was last seen voluntarily getting into a white Chrysler 300 with dark tinted windows.

“I am delighted,” DePanicis said. “A lot of missing kids cases don’t turn out this way.

“To know that she is alive and well is an ending that we can’t often celebrate.”

In an interview last week, Grantham said she was calling her daughter’s cellphone at least eight times a day, “especially when I go to bed and when I wake up.”

Grantham said then she and her family had been monitoring her daughter’s phone, Facebook and other social media accounts, but the girl hadn’t been using them

Chuck Biedka is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chuck at 724-226-4711, [email protected] or via Twitter @ChuckBiedka.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.