6 impaired drivers arrested in DUI patrol, checkpoint operation |
Valley News Dispatch

6 impaired drivers arrested in DUI patrol, checkpoint operation

Brian C. Rittmeyer

Police arrested six people for driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs during a roving patrol and a stationary checkpoint on Friday.

The North Hills DUI Task Force conducted a roving patrol in West Deer, Indiana and O’Hara townships, and a stationary checkpoint on Route 910 at the Indiana Township public works building.

In the roving patrol, 36 vehicles were stopped for vehicle code violations. Two drivers were given field sobriety tests, and both were arrested for driving under the influence.

One citation and 26 warnings were issued for vehicle code violations.

A total of 625 vehicles passed through the stationary checkpoint. Police made three arrests for driving under the influence of drugs, and one arrest for driving under the influence of alcohol.

One person was arrested on a bench warrant for drugs out of Allegheny County, six citations were issued for vehicle violations and one citation was issued for driving with a suspended license.

The North Hills DUI Task Force, now in its 17th year, includes police officers from Etna, Indiana Township, Northern Regional, O’Hara, Ross, Shaler, West Deer, West View, McCandless and Millvale.

Brian Rittmeyer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Brian at 724-226-4701, [email protected] or via Twitter @BCRittmeyer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.