Arnold code officer draws praise from landlords |
Valley News Dispatch

Arnold code officer draws praise from landlords

Brian C. Rittmeyer | Tribune-Review
Arnold City Hall.

It’s not every day a municipal code enforcement officer get applause at a city council meeting — especially from the landlords he polices.

But Arnold’s Scott Ponteri got just that, and a bump up from part-time to full-time status.

Ponteri drew plaudits from rental property owner Ben Davis and several other landlords on hand at Arnold’s city council meeting this week.

“As a landlord, I appreciate everything that’s being done,” Davis said. “He’s keeping the bad landlords in check and working with the good landlords to help keep the city clean. I’m all for it.”

Other landlords who spoke had a similar sentiment.

Since mid-September, Ponteri has issued 155 citations, 354 informational tags, 170 letters to property owners and has initiated 75 case files.

Cameras have been placed in alleys where used furniture and other items have been discarded. A private citizen donated 10 cameras for alleys.

“This is where we need to start,” said Councilwoman Debbie Vernon. “You get rid of blight and you can attract families and businesses. It’s amazing what I’ve seen the last seven months.”

Ponteri credits his 28 years as a police officer to his knowledge of handling people.

Police Chief Eric Doutt said more landlords need to inform tenants about the rules for trash pick-ups and what is eligible to be picked up.

Ponteri will make $14.50 per hour with benefits under his full-time status. He formerly worked a maximum of 32 hours per week.

George Guido is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.