ShareThis Page
North Apollo firemen urged to defend fire fee or risk losing it |
Valley News Dispatch

North Apollo firemen urged to defend fire fee or risk losing it

North Apollo volunteer fire department Member Amber Halliwell, President Jeff Walk and Assistant Chief Josh McKendree defend the need for a fire fee at a North Apollo Council meeting on Nov. 5, 2018.North Apollo volunteer fire department Member Amber Halliwell, President Jeff Walk and Assistant Chief Josh McKendree defend the need for a fire fee at a North Apollo Council meeting on Nov. 5, 2018.

North Apollo’s volunteer fire department must again prove to residents that their services are worth the controversial fire fee that township officials say 60 percent of the residents don’t want to pay.

A standing-room-only crowd of more than 60 people overflowed from council chambers Monday night. The majority defended the volunteer department of about 15 to 20 active firefighters that responds to about 120 calls each year.

Council will discuss the issue more but urges department representatives to take their case to the public, starting with a newsletter on the benefits of the department to be sent with the next water and sewage bill.

Council will make a decision about the fate of the fire fee by March.

The annual fee, $40 to $50 for residents, is collected by the borough and turned over to the fire department. Borough officials audit the department and say they are satisfied with their financial records, according to Council President Don Acker.

But council continues to hear from residents dissatisfied with paying the fee, with wanting to see firefighters take to street corners to raise more money.

Recently, council directed a pair of residents to visit homes throughout the borough to see how residents viewed the fee.

They don’t want to pay it.

About 60 percent don’t want the fee, while 40 percent do, according to a survey, the validity of which was questioned by some at the meeting.

“There has been no decision,” Acker said. “We are looking at options.

“We have to figure out a way to figure out the best decision for the borough,” he said.

Council urged the fire department to actively promote its work to the public. They encouraged the fire department to do its own survey, even hosting a survey box at the borough building.

“You have to turn this around,” Acker said to Josh McKendree, assistant chief.

McKendree said his fire department’s meetings are public; they have been open to residents. However, the public and council have yet to attend any of those meetings, he added.

Acker vowed to attend the fire department’s Tuesday meeting.

Council Vice President Dana Baustert released some statistics from Armstrong County emergency services that showed North Apollo firefighters were slower to leave the fire station on the way to a call than their neighboring companies to calls in the borough.

Firefighters defended themselves, saying the statistics don’t necessarily reflect when they arrive at the scene and the fact they are all volunteer. The times cited were within seconds of each other.

Baustert said she wanted to stress that residents still will be safe with other fire companies responding.

Resident Christie Hepler said that she felt fortunate to have a local fire department. She said she will gladly pay the fee, “because I’m not the one getting up in the middle of the night to go put out a fire.”

Residents have paid the fee every year since 2013 to support the North Apollo Volunteer Fire Department. This is the second time in less than two years that North Apollo Council will consider eliminating the fee.

Mary Ann Thomas is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Mary Ann at 724-226-4691, [email protected] or via Twitter @MaThomas_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.