Archive

ShareThis Page
Harrison OKs senior housing for former school building | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Harrison OKs senior housing for former school building

463317vndharrisonsrhousing2112118
Tom Yerace | For the Tribune-Review
The site plan for a proposed senior citizen housing development at the site of the former Highlands School District Administration building in Harrison.
463317vndharrisonsrhousing1112118
Tom Yerace | For the Tribune-Review
Andrew Haines, vice-president of Gatesburg Road Development, explains the site plan for a new senior citizens housing development proposed for the former Highlands School District administration building on 11th Avenue in Harrison.

The former Highlands School District administration building in Harrison may be transformed into a housing development for senior citizens by 2020.

Harrison Commissioners approved the building on 11th Avenue in Natrona Heights for a conditional use as senior housing.

That came after a public hearing at which Andrew Haines, executive vice-president of Gatesburg Road Development, developer of the project, presented plans for the site. Haines said his is the same company that converted the former Ridge Avenue Junior High School in New Kensington into senior citizen housing.

The $10 million project in Harrison calls for a three-story addition on the back of the current building, built in 1930, which will be gutted and converted to senior housing use.

Haines said the development would offer 20 single bedroom apartments, and ten two-bedroom units with five units designed for handicapped residents. Haines said the rents would range from $300 to $850 per month.

He said all residents, including spouses, must be at least 62 years old to live in the development.

Also, he said all prospective residents will undergo criminal background checks as well as credit checks as part of the application process.

Gatesburg, based in State College, does not yet own the property, according to Haines.

He said the company has a sales agreement in place with the property’s current owners Joseph Thimons and John Barch. However, that will not become final until Gatesburg secures financing for the project through the Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency.

Haines explained that if PHFA approves the project, it will provide Gatesburg with a package of tax credits. Gatesburg can then sell those tax credits to private investors to raise the money needed to build the project.

“We take the equity from those credits and that pays about 70 percent of the development costs,” Haines said.

“We will know in May of 2019 if we are awarded funding,” he added.

If the funding is secured, he said Gatesburg would close on the property within a couple of months and then submit its land development plan for approval by the township.

“We probably would not have these ready for occupancy until 2020,” Haines said.

Marlene Huet of Buffalo Township was at the meeting with her son, Tom, and said she is very interested in living in the proposed development.

“My son has his own house in Sarver and I don’t want my son to have to take care of his house and then take care of mine like he does now,” Huet said of why the development interested her.

Another reason is it will be like going home.

“I grew up on 12th Avenue,” Huet said.

Tom Yerace is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.