Apollo faces loss of solicitor, auditor on top of budget crisis |
Valley News Dispatch

Apollo faces loss of solicitor, auditor on top of budget crisis

Mary Ann Thomas

Apollo’s solicitor and auditor have resigned on the heels of council’s decision to eliminate the borough manager’s position and a troublesome budget with a hefty proposed tax hike.

Last week, council voted 3-2 to eliminate the borough manager position and released a preliminary budget that calls for a nearly 50 percent hike in property taxes.

The borough’s auditor, Joe Estermyer resigned Friday due to an “increased workload and other professional circumstances.”

Tim Miller, resigned on Nov. 26. In an interview with the Tribune-Review, Miller, who has been solicitor for the borough for four years, acknowledged that there were a lot of changes going on in Apollo.

“A fresh voice and a fresh set of eyes will best serve the borough at this point,” he said.

John Kautz, council president, said it would be pure speculation to suggest the proposed tax hike and loss of the borough manager influenced Miller’s and Estermyer’s decisions to resign.

However, the two resignations, are a “serious loss,” Kautz said.

Apollo Mayor Cindee Virostek said, “I’m devastated. They were very important professional relationships for the stability of Apollo.”

Kautz said council will have to address the loss of all three professionals.

In fact, Kautz and Virostek say that, without a borough manager, it will be difficult to hire a new solicitor and auditor.

Miller said he would stay until the end of the year. Estermyer, in his letter of resignation, said he would work with the borough and its new auditor for a smooth transition for the 2018 audit.

Council will discuss hiring a new auditor and solicitor at its meeting at 7 p.m. Thursday. Also expected at that meeting is a vote on the preliminary budget.

A final budget vote is planned for council’s Dec. 13 meeting.

Mary Ann Thomas is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Mary Ann at 724-226-4691, [email protected] or via Twitter @MaThomas_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.