ShareThis Page
Cops: North Carolina man killed in New Kensington had been in shootout |
Valley News Dispatch

Cops: North Carolina man killed in New Kensington had been in shootout

The Associated Press

Investigators haven’t identified any suspects in the fatal shooting of a 23-year-old North Carolina man last month in New Kensington, according to city police Chief Bob Deringer.

The shooting happened around 9:20 p.m. Nov. 21 in the 100 block of Catalpa Street.

The man who died, identified as Jonathan Woods, appears to have been involved in a shootout, according to Deringer. The chief said Woods had three guns on him at the time of the shooting and investigators recovered shell casings from two different guns at the scene.

“There were two different caliber shell casings in two separate locations that indicated the victim was shooting and whoever else was there was shooting,” he said. “Numerous spent shell casings were located at the intersection of Proctor Alley and Catalpa Street with one additional shell casing found near the victim.”

Deringer couldn’t say what type of guns Woods had on him or what kind of guns the shell casings came from.

Other details remain unclear. Deringer said police were never able to speak with Woods and they have not tracked down any witnesses or video footage of the incident.

There are no suspects, Deringer said.

Woods was flown to UPMC Presbyterian in Pittsburgh’s Oakland neighborhood after the shooting. He died of a gunshot wound to the head on Nov. 26, according to the Allegheny County Medical Examiner’s Office.

Deringer said Woods’ parents told investigators that their son recently came to Western Pennsylvania from North Carolina. He had been staying with a woman in Tarentum, but Deringer said Woods had a Pennsylvania identification card listing an Arnold address.

Westmoreland County Detectives are assisting New Kensington police in the investigation.

Anyone with information to call 911 or New Kensington police at 724-339-7534.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.