ShareThis Page
Man shrugs off $10K loss on Rivers Casino’s first sports bet |
Valley News Dispatch

Man shrugs off $10K loss on Rivers Casino’s first sports bet

Jamie Martines
| Monday, December 17, 2018 5:51 p.m
Andrew Russell | Tribune-Review
Gamblers place bets on various sports at Rivers Casino, Thursday, Dec. 13, 2018 after the North Shore casino’s sports book went live.

David Eldridge didn’t empty his piggy bank to place a $10,000 bet in favor of the New England Patriots ahead of Sunday’s game against the Pittsburgh Steelers.

That helps explain why Eldridge, 38, of Gibsonia, didn’t appear to be fazed following the Pats’ 17-10 loss.

“That wasn’t even my largest gambling endeavor,” said Eldridge, who was one of five Pittsburgh-area residents to place the first legal sports bets in Pittsburgh last Thursday during the grand opening of the Rivers Casino sports book.

Eldridge, an entrepreneur who said he got his start with Verizon franchises, isn’t a professional gambler but he’s had some success playing poker and other games.

About $1.3 million worth of success, he said.

“It’s just a hobby. I just love to play poker, I love poker tournaments,” he said.

Eldridge, who insists he’s a Steelers fan despite betting against the home team, said he’s happy the Steelers won. His personal loss isn’t going to keep him away from the sports book either.

“Hoping I can recoup 25 bucks or so by selling the ‘first sports bet ticket at Rivers Casino’ on eBay,” he tweeted Monday.

Jamie Martines is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jamie at 724-850-2867, or via Twitter @Jamie_Martines.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.