ShareThis Page
Pittsburgh Glass Works not required to extinguish underground East Deer fire |
Valley News Dispatch

Pittsburgh Glass Works not required to extinguish underground East Deer fire

Mary Ann Thomas
| Monday, December 17, 2018 6:36 p.m
Louis B. Ruediger | Tribune-Review
Ealier this year, Pittsburgh Glass Works employees assess two pockets of fire that emerged from the earth at the East Deer plant.

The owner of Pittsburgh Glass Works in East Deer has no immediate plans to extinguish the underground fire at the shuttered glass plant despite calls for action by area residents and township officials.

The underground blaze has been burning since at least September of 2017 when PGW started investigating and found the fire was fueled by coal refuse that apparently was used as backfill for the factory site decades ago.

After reviewing the situation, the state Department of Environmental Protection found “no imminent threat to human health, safety or the environment,” according to Lauren Fraley, DEP spokeswoman.

However, DEP is requiring the company to continue to monitor the fire, remove vegetation, and restrict access but nothing more, she said.

“DEP anticipates that the fire will extinguish on its own because of the limited amount of potential fuel,” Fraley said.

Since last year, PGW has been monitoring and addressing localized hot spots on the plant’s interior concrete floor and conducted limited excavation on the Allegheny River side the plant to assess the soil composition.

This month, PGW sent out aerial drones to take thermal imaging scans of its property to assess the extent of the fire. The company sends its reports to DEP, the Allegheny Health Department, local utilities and others, according to its website,

But that is no comfort to some of the residents who live near the plant, who complain of an odor, said township Supervisors Chairman Tony Taliani.

“We feel the solution to this problem is to extinguish the fire and PGW continues to resist that,” Taliani said.

Residents continue to complain about the smell and steam coming out of the ground behind the plant, he said.

“They are rightfully complaining and, unfortunately, the township can’t say ‘put it out,’” he said.

Taliani said the solution is to extinguish the fire and remediate the site for future use.

The fate of the site is important as PGW is the largest single property taxpayer in township, paying in of excess of $20,000 annually.

The office of State Rep. Frank Dermody, D-Oakmont, has been helping township officials.

“It is a frustrating situation,” said Bill Patton, a Dermody spokesman. “Obviously, the sooner the situation is resolved, the sooner the site can be put to another use.”

All the township can do at this point is watch and wait, he said.

PGW is actively trying to sell the property, according to its website.

Mary Ann Thomas is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Mary Ann at 724-226-4691, or via Twitter @MaThomas_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.