Archive

ShareThis Page
Brackenridge man accused of sexually assaulting 4-year-old girl | TribLIVE.com
Valley News Dispatch

Brackenridge man accused of sexually assaulting 4-year-old girl

Brian C. Rittmeyer
| Tuesday, December 18, 2018 1:33 p.m.
552546GavelNew

A 47-year-old Brackenridge man is accused of sexually assaulting a 4-year-old girl.

Eric Todd Clark, of Nelson Avenue, is free on a $25,000 bond while awaiting a preliminary hearing on charges of involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, unlawful contact with a minor, indecent assault and corruption of minors.

The hearing, previously continued from Dec. 12, is now scheduled for 2 p.m. Jan. 2 before District Judge Carolyn Bengel.

According to a criminal complaint, the incident happened on Nov. 16 at Nelson’s residence, and the girl told her parents about it at dinner that same day.

The girl was later interviewed at the Child Advocacy Center at UPMC Children’s Hospital. During that interview, the girl said she was in Clark’s bedroom watching cartoons when he allegedly took her clothes off. She said Clark told her not to “tell anyone in the world” about what had happened.

Clark was arrested on Dec. 4, and released from the Allegheny County Jail that same day.

Clark’s criminal history includes arrests for simple assault, criminal trespass, violation and contempt for protection from abuse orders, disorderly conduct, fleeing or eluding police and driving under the influence, the complaint states.

Brian Rittmeyer is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Brian at 724-226-4701, brittmeyer@tribweb.com or via Twitter @BCRittmeyer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.