$10K reward offered for info on whereabouts of Cassandra Gross |

$10K reward offered for info on whereabouts of Cassandra Gross

Cassandra Gross, who would have turned 52 in May, went missing on April 9, 2018.
Cassandra Gross of Unity, who would have turned 52 in May, went missing on April 9, 2018.
Cassandra Gross and her dog, Baxter

Family and friends of Cassandra Gross are offering $10,000 for information leading to her whereabouts.

“If money sells, then let’s talk,” said Emily Kelly, a family friend. ” I just really feel somebody will speak up.”

They hope the reward offer will help Gross’ family find the Unity woman who was last seen April 7.

Two anonymous donors are funding the reward and tips should be directed to Gross’ mother at 724-539-9553. Kathe Gross said tipsters can remain confidential.

“I just wish that whoever it is that knows would just come forward,” Kathe Gross said.

She reported Cassandra, who would have turned 52 in May, missing on April 9. Cassandra Gross’ blind and diabetic dog, Baxter, was found that day alone in the Beatty Crossroads area.

The next day, her burned red 2016 Mitsubishi Outlander was spotted by Norfolk Southern employees in a wooded area along train tracks near Twin Lakes Park.

Family and friends will be canvassing the area with 250 fliers about the reward, Kelly said.

In the days after Gross’ vehicle was found, state police were seen searching two Unity properties owned by Thomas G. Stanko, 47, who is being held in the Westmoreland County Prison on unrelated charges. One of those properties abuts Unity Cemetery on White Fence Lane, where his mother lives.

Searchers have twice been seen in the cemetery area this summer.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Renatta at 724-837-5374, [email protected] or via Twitter @byrenatta.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.