Pennsylvania aims to smooth ex-convicts’ path to employment |

Pennsylvania aims to smooth ex-convicts’ path to employment

State officials and community groups are trying to reduce employment hurdles for Pennsylvania’s former convicts, but finding work remains a struggle for ex-prisoners long after their release from incarceration.

Starting July 1, state agencies will no longer ask job candidates about criminal convictions as part of employment applications. The move mirrors similar “ban the box” initiatives gaining popularity across the country.

Pittsburgh and Philadelphia have similar fair-chance hiring practices enshrined in city ordinances. And while such initiatives don’t forbid candidate criminal background checks, they can give job seekers a chance to make their case to employers instead of being automatically weeded out of a candidate pool.

“Process matters,” said Beth Avery, a staff attorney with the National Employment Law Project. “If (an employer) knows from step one that a person has a record, that’s going to color their interaction. … It’s going to affect their assessment of a person.”

Nearly 20,000 inmates were released from Pennsylvania prisons in 2016, according to the Department of Corrections. Almost 17,000 were paroled, while 3,000 were released after completing their sentences.

Former convicts looking for work can do a few things to try to make the search easier, according to a report by Community Legal Services of Philadelphia. They can try to persuade employers to seek bonds against an often-perceived risk of theft. They can try to enforce a state law that allows employers to consider felony or misdemeanor convictions “only to the extent to which they relate to the applicant’s suitability for employment,” though that often requires a lawsuit.

They also can try to clean up their criminal records through expungements or pardons, although those options are limited in Pennsylvania.

“Most likely, they do not know of or cannot utilize any of these options, and their only alternatives are long, dogged and often repetitive job searches, work in the underground economy or a return to committing crimes,” the report states.

Michael Tedesco, 60, served seven months in prison and five years on probation following his 1990 guilty plea in a Penn Hills cocaine trafficking case. President Barack Obama pardoned the Murrysville businessman.

But for more than 25 years, Tedesco was burdened by his felony record. Through family, he was able to find work after being released from prison, but his criminal past often caused problems — notably when he tried to expand his successful car warranty business, Cars Protection Plus, into states with stringent licensing background checks.

“Everything you do, it’s a burden,” Tedesco said of his conviction. “You carry it throughout your life.”

Tedesco’s pardon marked the end of five years’ worth of on-again, off-again pardon applications with help from an old friend and attorney. But most former inmates won’t be lucky enough to have a president pardon their conviction and must instead turn to other options to make employment easier.

Dean Williams, a convicted felon who runs the Formerly Convicted Citizens Project in Pittsburgh, tries to help where he can. He pushed Pittsburgh to pass a “ban the box” ordinance, and he runs monthly workshops to help people navigate the often-perplexing process of cleaning up their records as much as possible.

Without a job and a safe place to live, people are more likely to return to crime after they’re released from prison.

“That hurts the community, that hurts their families, that hurts the people they are taking care of,” Williams said.

Williams originally funded his efforts through a Faulk Foundation grant, but that money has dried up. He’s left doing much of his work as a volunteer, though he recently started charging $10 for monthly workshops on the second Monday of every month at the Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh’s Smithfield Street location.

Williams hopes his work makes a difference, but he admitted helping people clean up their records and stay out of jail is a daunting task. His clients often need housing help, too, and he hopes to connect with other service providers to meet that need.

“It’s small increments toward making the situation better,” he said.

Some relief could soon come from the Department of Corrections. A federally funded pilot program seeks to improve the department’s re-entry efforts by better preparing inmates for their return to the workforce. SCI Fayette is one of six pilot institutions in the state.

Dorenda Hamarlund, DOC’s career pathways program manager, said the pilot program helps inmates identify viable career options and outline a plan for how they’ll attain those jobs. It involves traditional training and education as well as preparing inmates for interacting with employees and customers, job interviews and how to address their criminal past with potential employers.

“From the moment of incarceration, we’re looking at release,” Hamarlund said.

Michael Walton is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-1290, [email protected] com or via Twitter @WaltonReporting.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.