ShareThis Page
Milk surplus fallout begins to hit Western Pa. |

Milk surplus fallout begins to hit Western Pa.

| Thursday, June 15, 2017 10:38 p.m.
Kyle Hodges
Westmoreland County dairy farmer Rick Ebert, president of the Pennsylvania Farm Bureau, with his cows on Will-Mar-Re Farms in Derry Township.

Dairy farmers in Westmoreland County say they’re not surprised that a dairy in neighboring Cambria County has stopped buying milk from 11 farms.

The decision by Galliker’s Dairy was blamed on a statewide surplus of milk and depressed prices.

“Everyone in the industry is nervous whether they’re going to be the next one to receive a letter like that,” said Westmoreland County dairy farmer Rick Ebert, who is president of the Pennsylvania Farm Bureau.

Ebert, co-owner of Will-Mar-Re Farms in Derry Township, said dairy farmers used to have more options for selling their product. “I’ve been in this industry for more than 35 years, and I never thought I’d see the day when nobody wanted milk like this,” he said.

Ebert said he did not know whether any Westmoreland dairy farms will be directly affected by the Galliker’s decision. But three recently faced a similar predicament.

“The dairy industry around here is in turmoil. It’s a mess. Dairies are shutting people off,” said Jim Kepple of Kepple Brothers Farm in Salem Township.

Kepple said he and two other Salem Township dairy farms recently were let go by Colteryahn Dairy in Pittsburgh and had to find another buyer.

“We had a heck of a time finding another dairy to take us,” he said.

The three farms were scheduled to start selling their product to United Dairy in Uniontown on Thursday, said Bill Selembo of Selembo Dairy Farm.

“All three of us stuck together and worked this out,” he said. “It was a close call there. … United was good enough to take us in.”

The farms received a 30-day notice from Colteryahn last month, as required by the Pennsylvania Milk Marketing Board. The notice expired Wednesday.

Turner Dairy in Penn Hills announced Thursday that it had purchased Colteryahn Dairy, but it was unclear whether the acquisition was a factor in the decision to let the three farms go.

Colteryahn officials could not be reached for comment.

“They just said they can’t handle the excess milk. They’re losing money on the excess milk,” Selembo said.

Galliker COO Evan Fineman gave a similar reason for the company’s decision to let 11 of its 85 farms go, according to news accounts.

“The surplus nationally and especially in the mid-Atlantic and Northeast areas has been so large that many of the co-ops now have laid off many farmers, and we held tight as long as we could,” Fineman told a Johnstown TV station.

Pennsylvania Farm Bureau spokesman Mark O’Neill said the entire country, not just Pennsylvania, has experienced a milk surplus over the last two years. That oversupply drives prices down, which causes farmers to increase production.

“It’s typical supply-and-demand economics,” he said.

Other factors contributing to the milk surplus are the vagaries of foreign exports and the increasing efficiencies of dairy farms, O’Neill said.

“The trend has been (that) they’ve been producing more milk, but the demand for dairy products has been flat or down,” he said. “When you have an oversupply, the price in the grocery store goes down, but the price paid to the dairy farmer also goes down.”

The state Milk Marketing Board sets the minimum price that can be charged for milk on the first of each month.

Pennsylvania dairy farmers produced 10.80 billion pounds of milk in 2015 and 10.82 billion pounds in 2016 — what O’Neill described as a “modest” increase.

“The bottom line is: We try to find new markets all the time to make our milk available,” he said. “When our exports are high, that has a positive influence on the dairy industry and takes care of some of the supply issues.”

If the 11 farms let go by Galliker’s aren’t able to find new buyers, they may have to sell their herds and close up shop, Ebert said.

Stephen Huba is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-1280, or via Twitter @shuba_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.