Archive

ShareThis Page
Former PTO treasurer at Greensburg school accused of theft | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Former PTO treasurer at Greensburg school accused of theft

gtrOlbeter1

The former treasurer of the Nicely Elementary School Parent Teacher Organization in Greensburg was arraigned Friday on multiple theft and forgery charges for allegedly stealing nearly $5,000 from the organization since August.

Rachael A. Olbeter, 37, was arraigned before District Judge Chris Flanigan on charges of theft, receiving stolen property, theft by deception, access device fraud, forgery and identity theft.

City police Detective John Swank alleges in an affidavit that Olbeter forged signatures of other PTO officers on multiple checks drawn on the group’s account. He also alleges that Olbeter used the group’s debit card to buy $414 in personal items on her own Amazon account.

Swank alleges in court documents that the thefts began in August and continued until April 17 when other PTO officers became suspicious after discovering multiple discrepancies in checks drafted in Olbeter’s name.

Nicely Elementary School is in the Greensburg-Salem School District.

Attempts to reach other PTO officials for comment Friday were unsuccessful.

Olbeter’s preliminary hearing is scheduled May 24.

In March 2017, the former treasurer of Baggaley Elementary School’s Parent Teacher Organization in the Greater Latrobe School District, Rachel A. Pitts, 38, of Unity, was arrested by state police on theft charges for making $48,100 in personal expenditures from that nonprofit organization’s bank account.

Pitts is awaiting trail in common pleas court.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter @ppeirce_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.