ShareThis Page
Monessen heroin dealer sentenced to more than 27 years in prison |

Monessen heroin dealer sentenced to more than 27 years in prison


A Monessen heroin dealer with 15 prior convictions was sentenced to 27 years plus three months in prison for drug trafficking Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Pittsburgh.

Judge Arthur J. Schwab sentenced Maurice “Reese” Frezzell, 34, in connection with his December conviction by a federal jury in December for drug trafficking and distribution.

After Frezzell is released, Schwab also ordered him to serve six years of supervised release.

Frezzell was already on probation after serving a federal sentence of more than six years when the latest investigation began into his drug dealing in Washington and surrounding areas, the U.S. Attorney’s office said.

The Drug Enforcement Agency and local police used a confidential informant to buy heroin from Frezzell, leading to his arrest in 2015. More charges were filed after a search of Frezzell’s home turned up a number of other drugs.

Federal prosecutors informed Schwab before sentencing that Frezzell’s criminal career began at age 12 with a sexual assault, and has since included two separate assaults on law enforcement and illegal firearm possession.

Police departments in Monessen, Canonsburg, state police, the Washington County District Attorney’s office, agents from the state attorney general’s office, the Washington County Sheriff’s Office and the IRS assisted in the investigation.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-850-2860, or via Twitter @ppeirce_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.