Archive

ShareThis Page
Flood-damaged residences assessed for aid | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Flood-damaged residences assessed for aid

Tribune-Review
| Tuesday, July 3, 2018 7:57 p.m.
gtrCookTwpFlood2062118
Submitted
Paul and Julene Sabolik wait on the roof of their home along Green Hollow Lane in Cook Township after flood waters rushed into their single-story home along the Loyalhanna Creek on June 20.

State and county officials this week toured about 40 homes in Ligonier Borough and Ligonier, Cook and Donegal townships that were most affected by the flash flood in the eastern end of the county on June 20.

Representatives from the Westmoreland County Department of Public Safety and Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency assessed the damage Monday in those areas that were deluged by severe flooding of the Loyalhanna Creek, according to a statement Tuesday from the public safety department.

The assessments were the first step to validate the eligibility for low-interest, long-term U.S. Small Business Administration loans if the SBA makes a disaster declaration.

The public safety department is asking any resident whose home or apartment had flood water on the first floor, damaged contents or damage to land and any improvements around the residence to contact the department by July 23 at 724-600-9539.

Any resident whose property sustained storm damage and meets the criteria can have their information added to the validation process by contacting the emergency management coordinator in the municipality where they live.

For further information visit: www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/files/SBA_Disaster_Loan_Program_Reference_Guide.pdf

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-836-5252 or jnapsha@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.