ShareThis Page
Ruffsdale man gets burglary sentence reduced |

Ruffsdale man gets burglary sentence reduced


A Westmoreland County judge on Monday cut the prison sentence of a Ruffsdale man convicted in a string of 13 burglaries.

Timothy Stants, 52, pleaded guilty in December to 41 counts in connection with burglaries at businesses throughout Westmoreland, Fayette and Lawrence counties. In June, he was ordered to serve 10 to 20 years in prison.

Stants returned to court Monday to say that he will be required to serve an additional two years behind bars as a result of a parole revocation that resulted from his most recent conviction. His sentence for the new burglary convictions will not begin until the final 24 months of the parole revocation is served, according to defense attorney Donna McClelland.

“It was the intention he serves a total of 10 years, and we want to give the court the opportunity to change its order so that the total time is 10 years,” McClelland said.

Assistant District Attorney Anthony Iannamorelli opposed any reduction.

“He will have the opportunity to apply for parole every year,” Iannamorelli said.

Common Pleas Judge Christopher Feliciani agreed with the defense, saying the original sentence was crafted so that Stants was kept behind bars a total of 10 additional years. As a result, the judge reduced Stants’ burglary sentences to 8 to 20 years.

Police said Stants targeted businesses to burglarize and identified his involvement after learning about a lengthy criminal past that included convictions for more than 40 burglaries in the early 2000s.

Iannamorelli said Stants still faces criminal charges in Allegheny County and at least two other states.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.