ShareThis Page
Unity insurer offers $10K reward in arson that destroyed township garage |

Unity insurer offers $10K reward in arson that destroyed township garage

Jeff Himler

The insurance carrier for Unity Township is offering up to $10,000 for information leading to a conviction in a Sept. 24 arson that destroyed the public works building.

The township should have plans completed soon for building a replacement. Bids could go out by early September, township Solicitor Gary Falatovich said.

The reward is offered as part of the township’s policy though Cincinnati Insurance.

“All the insurance policies nowadays have additional endorsements that provide reward coverage in arson cases,” Falatovich explained.

Anyone with information about the arson is asked to contact state police at 724-832-3288.

According to Falatovich, the replacement building will retain the same concrete block construction and will occupy the same space as the original 2004 structure. But the new building will have some enhancements that are in line with current construction codes, including a sprinkler system and electrical upgrades, he said.

Joe Bleehash, the architect for the burned building, is also working on the replacement.

A state police fire marshal estimated the loss of the building, and vehicles and equipment inside, at up to $5 million. Township Supervisor John Mylant and employee Scott Morrison were able to drive a few vehicles out of the burning building, and several others already were parked outside.

The township has replaced most of the destroyed items and is renting two temporary garages on Route 981 and Lloyd Avenue Extension.

Mylant said the township still wants to replace a street sweeper but has delayed the purchase until 2019. It could cost more than $200,000.

Jeff Himler is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jeff at 724-836-6622, or via Twitter @jhimler_news.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.