ShareThis Page
Search for Cassandra Gross continues near Unity Cemetery |

Search for Cassandra Gross continues near Unity Cemetery

Cassandra Gross and her dog, Baxter
Renatta Signorini | Tribune-Review
Searchers and state police worked near Unity Cemetery on Friday, July 20, 2018 in the search for Cassandra Gross, who has been missing since April.

State police and a team of searchers continued looking near Unity Cemetery on Friday for a woman who has been missing since April.

The team spent several hours there on June 25 and resumed the search in the same area Friday, police said.

They are looking for Cassandra Gross, a Unity woman who was last seen April 7, or any clues that might lead them to her. She would have turned 52 in May.

About 30 people assisted in the June search, including Ohio-based Rapid Response Services, state police, local searchers and cadaver dogs. Rapid Response Services returned Friday, as did troopers and dogs.

Family members reported Gross missing on April 9.

Norfolk Southern employees on April 10 spotted her burned red 2016 Mitsubishi Outlander in a wooded area along train tracks near Twin Lakes Park.

In the days afterward, troopers were seen searching two Unity properties owned by Thomas G. Stanko, 47, who is being held in the Westmoreland County Prison on unrelated charges. One of those properties abuts Unity Cemetery on White Fence Lane, where his mother lives.

Searchers have contended with dense wooded areas and rough terrain while searching in the area near Unity Cemetery.

Anyone with information about Gross’ disappearance should call state police at 724-832-3288.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Renatta at 724-837-5374, or via Twitter @byrenatta.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.