ShareThis Page
Route 22 crash claims Greensburg driver, sends 2 passengers to hospitals |

Route 22 crash claims Greensburg driver, sends 2 passengers to hospitals

Jeff Himler
| Friday, August 10, 2018 9:36 p.m.

A Greensburg man was killed and two passengers were injured after his car was rear-ended by a pickup truck Friday morning on Route 22 in Salem, according to state police.

Police said Charles Vincent Hodgkins, 27, was trapped in the car and had to be freed by firefighters and emergency medical crew members. He was taken to Forbes Hospital in Monroeville, where he was pronounced dead, police said.

Brittany Ann Hodgkins, 28, of Greensburg, who was a front-seat passenger in the car, was not wearing a seat belt and suffered a significant injury, police said. She was taken to Forbes Hospital and then transferred to Allegheny General Hospital in Pittsburgh, where she was listed in serious condition Friday night.

A 3-year-old Greensburg girl restrained in a child seat in the car suffered a lower-limb injury and was taken to Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, according to police.

The crash occurred at about 9 a.m. as the car was stopped on Route 22 at the intersection of East Pittsburgh Street.

The truck had moderate damage to its front end. The driver, Brian Keith Clemons of New Alexandria, declined medical treatment, police said.

The car received heavy rear-end damage. It spun and came to rest in the center median of the intersection.

Police are continuing their investigation.

Jeff Himler is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jeff at 724-836-6622, or via Twitter @jhimler_news.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.