ShareThis Page
Yukon landfill expansion meeting slated |

Yukon landfill expansion meeting slated

A large bucket mixes the industrial waste in a solidification unit at MAX Environmental Technologies’ Yukon hazardous waste treatment facility. The site was the topic of a public hearing last week.

A community meeting to explain the proposed expansion of a Yukon facility that treats hazardous waste and stores the residual material is planned for 7 p.m. Wednesday at the Yukon Fire Hall, 124 Highway St., in South Huntingdon.

Robert Shawver, MAX Environmental Technologies Inc. chief executive officer, will provide a general company update and discuss the company’s proposed Landfill 7, said Susan Forney, company spokeswoman. MAX Environmental has said the proposed 14-acre landfill is planned for a remote area further from Yukon residents and is expected to extend the life of its operations by 20 to 30 years.

The project could cost between $15 million and $17 million, according to Shawver. The new landfill, where treated waste from steel mills and brownfield sites and oil and natural gas operations would be buried, would replace a landfill that is expected to be filled in a few years.

MAX Environmental has been conducting tests on the proposed sites. The state Department of Environmental Protection will require a formal public hearing in order for MAX to obtain state permits to expand its operations.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at 724-836-5252 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.