ShareThis Page
Latrobe police chief, 14 others complete new Saint Vincent master’s program |

Latrobe police chief, 14 others complete new Saint Vincent master’s program

| Monday, August 27, 2018 1:45 p.m
Brian F. Henry | Trib Total Media
Latrobe police Chief James Bumar (far left) and two other officers film a public service announcement in 2015. (Brian F. Henry | Trib Total Media)

Retiring Latrobe police Chief James Bumar is among the first graduates of Saint Vincent College’s new Master of Science in Criminology Program, the school announced .

Fifteen new master’s candidates, including Bumar, received their degrees from the college Monday. The program can be completed in one calendar year.

Bumar, 56, of Unity, plans to retire at the end of August after 34 years with the Latrobe Police Department, including eight years as chief. He intends to teach and possibly pursue a Ph.D. in criminology.

The graduate program, part of the McKenna School of Business, Economics and Government, is designed to prepare graduates for leadership positions within the criminal justice system.

At least five of the graduates have been accepted into or will pursue doctoral studies. One has accepted a graduate teaching position at the University of Nebraska-Omaha while pursuing a Ph.D. Two other students have been accepted into law schools. One will attend the University of Minnesota School of Law. Others have taken positions with various law enforcement agencies in the region.

The other graduates are: Kelli Christine Hardin, Eli J. Holt, Ariel Nicole James, Christopher Adam Jodis, Corissa Ann Krempasky, Julie Alexandra Marcinik, Jonathan David Nace, Courtney Lynn Rickard, August Irvin Sander, Christian Delaney Trueax, Felecia Joy Watt, Jasmine Lynna Weems, Marissa Taylor Wright and Paige Lindsay Zurenski.

Stephen Huba is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Stephen at 724-850-1280, or via Twitter @shuba_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.