Archive

ShareThis Page
Judge again rejects Vandergrift man’s appeal of infant daughter’s death | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Judge again rejects Vandergrift man’s appeal of infant daughter’s death

Tribune-Review
| Wednesday, September 5, 2018 3:24 p.m
200010vndshakenh111712
Submitted
State police charged Matthew Milisits of Vandergrift with murder on Nov. 28, 2012, for allegedly shaking to death his 8-week-old daughter, Sophia Ludwiczak. Sophia died from brain damage on Nov. 20, 2012.State police charged Matthew Milisits of Vandergrift with murder on Nov. 28, 2012, for allegedly shaking to death his 8-week-old daughter, Sophia Ludwiczak. Sophia died from brain damage on Nov. 20, 2012.

A Westmoreland County judge on Wednesday rejected the appeal of a Vandergrift man serving a 40-year prison sentence for the murder of his infant daughter.

Common Pleas Court Judge Rita Hathaway ruled there was no basis for the appeal filed by Matthew Milisits, who contended his guilty plea should be vacated because he was given erroneous information by a former lawyer.

Milisits, 36, claimed he was told he would receive a sentence no longer than 10 years in prison when he pleaded guilty to a third-degree murder charge in 2014.

Police said he violently shook his 2-month-old daughter during a three-hour visit with the child in November 2012. The baby died from injuries sustained in the assault.

Hathaway sentenced Milisits to serve a 20-to-40-year prison sentence.

Hathaway, in a three-page opinion, said the official record from Milisits’ guilty plea hearing revealed that he was told the maximum sentence for pleading guilty to third-degree murder could be 40 years in prison.

“Because the testimony and the record belie defendant’s claims that his plea was unknowing and involuntary, there is no merit to defendant’s claims,” Hathaway wrote.

Two prior appeals of his conviction and sentence were previously dismissed by the judge.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293 or rcholodofsky@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.