Irwin budget dispute with fire department heats up |

Irwin budget dispute with fire department heats up

Joe Napsha
Firefighters are shown at the scene of a house fire in Irwin that broke out late Tuesday, Jan. 23, 2018. Pennsylvania Avenue was closed for about a block in either direction.

In a dispute with its fire department, Irwin officials are holding for ransom copies of prior budgets until the borough is reimbursed $2,200 to cover extra ambulance fuel expenses incurred in providing patient transfers.

“When we get what we asked for, we will exchange,” council member Gail Macioce told the fire department at a meeting last week.

“So you don’t trust your local fire hall,” Deputy fire Chief Shawn Stitely said in a testy exchange at Wednesday’s meeting in response to Macioce’s comment.

The two sides could discuss the matter further at a budget workshop Tuesday.

The fire department this summer began a non-emergency patient transfer service and had mistakenly used borough funds to pay for fuel, borough officials said.

Stitely said borough officials never responded to a request he made
Aug. 30 for copies of previous annual budgets. The deputy fire chief repeatedly asked when the department could get budgets from previous years.

Council members rebuffed Stitely when he asked for a third private meeting between fire officials and the borough regarding its budget. Through two meetings, the sides “did not get too far,” Stitely said.

“There’s a lot of unanswered questions we need to get answers to,” he said.

Borough administrators refused to tell the Tribune-Review what it allocated to the fire department in 2017 and 2018. The newspaper filed a public records request for the information, as well as for an accounting of what the fire department has spent through Sept. 1.

The department was not over budget as of August, council President Rick Burdelski said. It can overspend on a particular line item without being required to reimburse the borough, Burdelski added.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at 724-836-5252 or
[email protected]

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.