Veterans disability benefit criteria expanded |

Veterans disability benefit criteria expanded

Deb Erdley
Eric Schmadel | Tribune-Review
Poppy pins for a veterans tribute at the Bethlen Home on November 2, 2013 in Ligonier.

Military veterans and veterans’ widows now may be eligible for disability benefits under new guidelines the federal government issued recently, expanding income eligibility criteria.

Westmoreland County Veterans’ Affairs Director Matt Zamosky said federal authorities raised the asset limit for those seeking benefits for a non-service based disability from $80,000 to $123,600. The figure represents the maximum in assets, exclusive of a home situated on a lot of two acres or less, that a couple may have and still be eligible for an income-based disability pension, to help offset the costs of home care aides or institutional care.

Future recipients will have to undergo an asset audit that will ultimately go back three years to ensure there is no intentional offloading of assets. Zamosky said such audits will be phased in gradually starting with an audit looking back one year, then two and ultimately three.

“Even if you’re not in a situation where you need care, make sure that you or a family member checks it out because the benefit could be helpful,” Zamosky said.

Additional information is available through the Westmoreland County Veterans’ Affairs Office at 724-830-3530.

Deb Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Deb at 412-320-7996, [email protected] or via Twitter @deberdley_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.