ShareThis Page
Police: Girl, 5, seeks help after South Greensburg mom’s drug overdose |

Police: Girl, 5, seeks help after South Greensburg mom’s drug overdose

| Thursday, November 15, 2018 8:48 a.m

A 5-year-old girl got help from a neighbor after her mother apparently overdosed on drugs this month in South Greensburg, according to police.

Marissa Ann Maddy, 26, was charged Wednesday with child endangerment.

Police were called to Reamer Avenue at 10:30 p.m. Nov. 1 and found Maddy unresponsive on the second floor. A neighbor who was summoned by Maddy’s daughter directed police to a hypodermic needle nearby, according to a criminal complaint. Officers also found an empty stamp bag of heroin and a metal spoon elsewhere in the house.

Maddy eventually regained consciousness and was treated by ambulance personnel, police said. The 5-year-old girl and her 1-year-old sister, who police said was in the living room, were in the care of family members.

It’s the second time in less than two months a South Greensburg mother was arrested after a drug overdose that prompted her child to seek help. Leanne Schuler, 35, was unresponsive Sept. 28 when her 5-year-old daughter called for help, according to police. Ambulance personnel used naloxone — an opioid overdose reversal drug — to revive Schuler at her Poplar Street apartment.

She is charged with child endangerment. A Dec. 11 preliminary hearing is set.

No court action had been scheduled in Maddy’s case.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Renatta at 724-837-5374, or via Twitter @byrenatta.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.