ShareThis Page
Police: Greensburg woman stole $52K from chiropractor’s office |

Police: Greensburg woman stole $52K from chiropractor’s office

Renatta Signorini
| Tuesday, December 18, 2018 2:09 p.m

A Greensburg woman allegedly stole $52,625 over six months this year from a Southwest Greensburg chiropractor’s office she managed, according to police.

Cynthia Bisignani-Hill, 44, is charged with numerous counts of theft, receiving stolen property and forgery.

Police said they were notified Dec. 1 of discrepancies in bank accounts belonging to Edge Spine & Joint Medical Center, according to an affidavit. Bisignani-Hill, who used to be office manager, allegedly wrote 23 checks between June 15 and Nov. 8 and forged the business owner’s signature, police said.

The checks allegedly were deposited into her bank account. After she quit the job, the business owner noticed the discrepancies, police said

Bisignani-Hill told investigators in an interview this month that the money was “bonuses” and that she spent it on casino trips, bills and other expenses, according to the affidavit. The business owner denied authorizing any bonuses and said the amount missing was about $20,000 more than her annual salary.

The charges were filed last week and were sent by summons Monday. Bisignani-Hill did not have an attorney listed in online court records. She could not be reached. A Feb. 19 preliminary hearing is set.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Renatta at 724-837-5374, or via Twitter @byrenatta.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.