Catholic Diocese of Greensburg removes Uniontown priest |

Catholic Diocese of Greensburg removes Uniontown priest

A priest with the Diocese of Greensburg has been removed from his assignment following allegations of abuse about 50 years ago at an Apollo parochial school.

The Rev. James W. Clark, assigned as parochial vicar for five Uniontown-based parishes, was removed from his positions with the diocese Friday, according to a release issued Saturday evening.

The parishes are St. Mary (Nativity), St. John the Evangelist, St. Therese, Little Flower of Jesus and St. Joseph. He also was removed as chaplain of Uniontown Hospital.

“An allegation was received by the Diocese of Greensburg on Thursday … against Father James W. Clark, which dates to events five decades ago, prior to his entrance into the seminary and ordination as a priest, while working as a janitor at the former St. James School in Apollo,” the release reads, in part.

That school closed in 1998, according to information provided by the Apollo Historical Society.

The exact nature of the allegations have not been made clear.

Jerry Zufelt, diocesan spokesman, said Saturday he couldn’t say more than the diocese said in its release.

“A decision was made in response to an allegation the diocese received Thursday,” Zufelt said. “Otherwise, I cannot comment.”

Clark did not immediately respond to a request for comment. A message left with the St. James school was not immediately returned.

The release indicates diocesan employees have been “trained to be aware of the signs of child sexual abuse and how to report it.”

According to the release, priests in Westmoreland, Armstrong, Indiana and Fayette counties have been instructed to announce at Mass on Sunday that Clark was removed from his post.

“The primary reason for this unilateral announcement among all the parishes in the Diocese of Greensburg is to remind any victim that we stand ready to help them,” the release reads, in part.

According to the release, this is the first time allegations of abuse have been leveled against Clark.

However, allegations against Clark represent at least the second time in the past year a priest from the Greensburg Diocese has been accused of abuse.

A grand jury investigation recently examined decades of sexual abuse reports in the six Pennsylvania dioceses ­— including Greensburg and Pittsburgh.

The state Supreme Court this week blocked the release of that report to give unindicted people named in it a chance to challenge any findings.

Matthew Medsger is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at 724-226-4675, [email protected] or via Twitter @matthew_medsger.

Diocese of Greenburg
The Rev. James W. Clark
Carolyn Rogers | Tribune-Review
Father Daniel Carr stands in front of the alter during his ordination into priesthood at Blessed Sacrament Catherdral in Greensburg on Saturday, June 30, 2018.
Carolyn Rogers | Tribune-Review
The Rev. Daniel Carr holds the blood of Christ during his ordination into the priesthood at Blessed Sacrament Cathedral, Greensburg, June 30.
Carolyn Rogers | Tribune-Review
Priests walk down the center aisle at the start of Father Daniel Carr's ordination to the priesthood at Blessed Sacrament Catherdral in Greensburg on Saturday, June 30, 2018.
Carolyn Rogers | Tribune-Review
Father Daniel Carr kneels in front of the altar during his ordination to the priesthood at Blessed Sacrament Catherdral in Greensburg on Saturday, June 30, 2018.
Carolyn Rogers | Tribune-Review
Father Daniel Carr lays on the ground during his ordination to the priesthood at Blessed Sacrament Catherdral in Greensburg on Saturday, June 30, 2018.
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.