Cops: Mt. Pleasant woman tried to blame boyfriend for self-inflicted injuries |

Cops: Mt. Pleasant woman tried to blame boyfriend for self-inflicted injuries

Paul Peirce

A 45-year-old woman cut her arms with a serrated butter knife over the weekened and called police in an unsuccessful attempt to have her boyfriend arrested during a domestic argument, Mt. Pleasant police alleged in court documents.

Instead, police charged Amy L. Garbowsky with criminal trespass, defiant trespass and two counts of simple assault following the incident at 5:45 p.m. Sunday at the victim’s Pleasant Manor apartment.

Garbowsky contacted police saying a man had slit her arms with a knife. Police arrived to find Garbowsky, , “holding a rag on the inside of her arm,” yelling at a man inside the apartment, Officer Justin James reported.

Multiple neighbors reported “they heard Garbowsky state that she would cut herself and he would go to jail,” James reported.

Garbowsky’s boyfriend told police that during an argument Garbowsky “struck him with a broken piece of wood with a screw in it.” Police said the boyfriend denied cutting Garbowsky and said the “abrasive wounds” on her arm were self-inflicted. The man had a cut on his arm from the alleged assault, James reported.

The boyfriend’s 9-year-old son also was in the apartment during the altercation and corroborated his father’s story, James wrote in court documents.

Police were called to the apartment earlier Sunday and Garbowsky was removed from the property and instructed not to return, James reported.

Garbowsky was arraigned Monday before acting District Judge Chris Flanigan and ordered held in the Westmoreland County Prison after failing to post $5,000 bond. A hearing is scheduled Dec. 6 before Norvelt District Judge Roger Eckels.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter @ppeirce_trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.