Cops: Murrysville man hit with Taser after trying to punch officer |

Cops: Murrysville man hit with Taser after trying to punch officer


A Murrysville man who called police with false concerns of a reportedly suicidal person Monday ended up getting tased after he appeared to be preparing to punch a policeman, according to court documents.

Nicholas William Tkach, 42, was being held in the Westmoreland County Prison on $50,000 bond.

When police arrived at Tkach’s Kistler Road home at 6:14 p.m., they found him extremely intoxicated and having trouble text messaging a woman with whom he was forbidden to have contact under a protection-from-abuse order. Murrysville police sent Plum officers to check on her.

After Murrysville police refused to take him to see the woman, he allegedly started threatening to kill officers and headed into a basement while three officers followed, according to court papers. Tkach appeared to prepare to punch an officer when another fired his Taser, hitting the suspect twice in the back.

Tkach is charged with aggravated assault, resisting arrest, terroristic threats and public drunkenness. He did not have an attorney listed in online court records.

A July 3 preliminary hearing is set.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach her at 724-837-5374, [email protected] or via Twitter @byrenatta.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.