Archive

Derry woman who ran Latrobe day care convicted of endangerment | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Derry woman who ran Latrobe day care convicted of endangerment

Renatta Signorini
Gtr4Knecht041115
Lisa Knecht of Derry Twp. was convicted of child endangerment.

A Derry Township woman stood silently with her hands clasped Friday afternoon as a jury announced it convicted her of 11 felony child endangerment counts.

Lisa Knecht, 54, was led away in handcuffs by sheriff’s deputies once her bond was revoked by Westmoreland County Judge Rita Hathaway at the conclusion of her five-day trial for allowing her husband, a convicted sex offender, access to children at the day care she operated in Latrobe.

“I love you,” Knecht whispered to her daughter on her way out of the courtroom, as a few witnesses and mothers of children who were enrolled in the day care thanked and hugged Assistant District Attorney Judy Petrush and county Detective Robert Weaver.

Jurors deliberated about two hours.

Prosecutors told the jury of six men and six women that Knecht knew her husband, Donald Knecht, had previous sex crime convictions but still permitted him to be at Bright Beginnings Day Care from 2007 to May 2011, when it closed.

Donald Knecht served two five-year probation terms, one stemming from a 1989 arrest for molesting a young girl in Virginia and the second after a 1996 lewdness incident in New Jersey.

“(Lisa Knecht) chose. She made a choice to pretend like it didn’t happen,” Petrush told jurors during closing arguments. “She turned a blind eye.”

“Lisa Knecht chose to operate a daycare. She took money from parents and she took their most precious possession …,” Petrush said. “Instead of protecting these children, she knowingly exposed them to the risk of harm.”

Donald Knecht is serving a 12 12-to-25-year prison sentence since pleading guilty in Westmoreland County in 2012 to rape and possession of child pornography. Police said those charges don’t involve children at the day care.

Several parents of children who attended the center and former staffers testified that they regularly saw Donald Knecht there interacting with children, sometimes playing with them or having them sit on his lap.

Lisa Knecht has maintained her innocence.

She testified in her own defense that she was unaware that Donald Knecht was on probation when she married him in 1993. She didn’t know the truth about her husband’s arrest in New Jersey and she didn’t make him get clearances to be at the day care because he wasn’t an employee or a volunteer, she told the jury.

Jurors could infer, Petrush argued, that Lisa Knecht “knew he couldn’t get” clearances.

Knecht told jurors that her husband was rarely at the center, and when he was, it was only for a few minutes. She testified that she would sometimes leave him unsupervised in the facility or leave to attend to other business.

Defense attorney Greg Cecchetti told jurors during closing arguments that “my client knew nothing” and questioned the recollections of witnesses.

“She has lost her livelihood, something she holds dear to her,” Cecchetti told the jury. “She has lost the ability to earn.”

“Her life was around kids, and now that’s all been taken away from her because of Donald’s prior criminal history and the allegations that Lisa knew about it,” Cecchetti argued. “She’s being dragged down because of the sordid details of what her husband was doing behind her back.”

Knecht faces a sentence of up to seven years on each of the 11 charges. She previously had pleaded guilty to 10 child endangerment counts, and Hathaway said she intended to send her to jail. Knecht withdrew the guilty plea at a sentencing hearing last month and demanded a trial.

Knecht’s sentencing is set for May 15.

Renatta Signorini is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-837-5374 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.